A concurrent resolution expressing the sense of the Congress that Richard M. Nixon should pay to the United States the sum of $66,614.03 for non-security-related improvements to his San Clemente estate and that the President and the Attorney General should attempt to recover such sum.
Latest action. Referred to House Committee on Public Works and Transportation.
Expresses the sense of Congress that: (1) former President Richard M. Nixon should pay the United States $66,614.03 for federally-funded improvements to his California estate (known as La Casa Pacifica) which were not made for security purposes; and (2) the President and the Attorney General should attempt to recover such sum.
Written by analysts at the Congressional Research Service and published on Congress.gov, not by Civibrief. Summarized at the "Introduced in House" stage on June 26, 1979. It describes the bill, it is not the legal text.
Where is it in the process, and what happens next?
A concurrent resolution needs both chambers to adopt it, and is then done. It is not sent to the President and does not become law.
The record's latest action, on June 26, 1979: Referred to House Committee on Public Works and Transportation.
- Adoption by the House
- Adoption by the Senate
What is a concurrent resolution, exactly?
A concurrent resolution is how the two chambers agree on something between themselves, such as a budget framework or the date they adjourn. Both chambers adopt it, the President plays no part, and it does not carry the force of law.
Has anyone actually voted on it?
No. No roll call in this Congress cites this measure. That is the ordinary outcome: most measures never reach a recorded floor vote, and a committee ends most of them simply by not acting.
A vote is not the only thing that happens to a measure. Hearings, markups, and referrals are all recorded actions, and none of them is a vote of the full chamber.
Who is behind it?
ALLEN ERTEL (D-PA) introduced it on June 26, 1979, and 27 members have since signed on as cosponsors.
They are 27 Democrats.
Cosponsoring is a formal signature on the text. It is not a commitment to vote for the measure, it does not bind anyone's party, and a long list of cosponsors is a measure of attention rather than of prospects.
How long has it been in play?
It was introduced on June 26, 1979, 17290 days ago. The most recent recorded action was 17290 days ago, on June 26, 1979.
Measures do not carry over. Anything the 96th Congress has not finished by January 3, 1981 dies when the term ends, and has to be introduced again from the start in the next Congress.
That deadline applies to this measure too, even though it was never headed for the President's desk.
Every answer above is assembled from this measure's own record on Congress.gov and from published counts of what Congress has passed before. Civibrief does not predict outcomes and takes no position on any measure.
Vote history
- HouseIn committee, no floor vote yet
- SenateAwaits House passage
- PresidentAwaits both chambers