Private, no accountPrivacy details: browsing privately, no account needed
You're browsing privately, no account needed. Your region stays in this session and your precise location is never stored.What we store
H.J.Res. 105 · 119th CongressEnacted

Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Bureau of Land Management relating to "North Dakota Field Office Record of Decision and Approved Resource Management Plan".

Latest action. Became public lawWhat a bill becomes when enacted, numbered by Congress and order of enactment: Public Law 119-4 is the 4th law of the 119th Congress.Read the full definition (opens a new tab) No: 119-49. · December 11, 2025

Live record from Congress.gov, updated as the official record changes.
What this bill would do
Official summary · Congressional Research Service

This joint resolution nullifies the rule submitted by the Bureau of Land Management (BLM) relating to the Record of Decision and Approved Resource Management Plan (RMP) for the North Dakota Field Office and issued on January 8, 2025.

By way of background, an RMP guides the management of lands administered by BLM. The 2025 North Dakota RMP modified the 1988 RMP, including by limiting development of oil and gas in low-potential areas and new coal leasing to areas within four miles of existing mines.

Written by analysts at the Congressional Research Service and published on Congress.gov, not by Civibrief. Summarized at the "Introduced in House" stage on July 10, 2025. It describes the bill, it is not the legal text.

Status
Introduced
July 10, 2025
In committee
Passed a chamber
Cleared Congress
Enacted
December 11, 2025
Where this sits in the process
Common questions
Composed from the official record
Where is it in the process, and what happens next?

This joint resolution has been enacted. It is law.

The record's latest action, on December 11, 2025: Became Public Law No: 119-49.

What is a joint resolution, exactly?

A joint resolution travels the same road as a bill: both chambers pass it and the President signs it, and it then has the same force as any other law. The label is largely a matter of custom, often used for narrow or time-limited measures.

One exception matters. A joint resolution proposing an amendment to the Constitution is not sent to the President at all. It goes to the states, and three quarters of them have to ratify it.

Has anyone actually voted on it?

Yes. 3 recorded roll-call votes cite this measure, listed further down this page with every member's position.

Who is behind it?

Julie Fedorchak (R-ND) introduced it on July 10, 2025. No cosponsors are recorded.

Cosponsoring is a formal signature on the text. It is not a commitment to vote for the measure, it does not bind anyone's party, and a long list of cosponsors is a measure of attention rather than of prospects.

Every answer above is assembled from this measure's own record on Congress.gov and from published counts of what Congress has passed before. Civibrief does not predict outcomes and takes no position on any measure.

Vote history

  1. House
    Passed on a recorded vote
  2. Senate
    Passed on a recorded vote
  3. President
    Signed into law
Senate · H. J. Res. 105; A joint resolution providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Bureau of Land Management relating to "North Dakota Field Office Record of Decision and Approved Resource Management Plan".Passed
Yea 50 Nay 45 Present / not voting 0
Official roll callOctober 8, 2025
Senate · Motion to Proceed to H. J. Res. 105; A joint resolution providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Bureau of Land Management relating to "North Dakota Field Office Record of Decision and Approved Resource Management Plan".Agreed to
Yea 51 Nay 47 Present / not voting 0
Official roll callOctober 8, 2025