Fish and Wildlife Coordination Act Amendments
Latest action. Referred to House Committee on Merchant Marine and Fisheries.
Fish and Wildlife Coordination Act Amendments - Provides that, pursuant to the Fish and Wildlife Coordination Act, the requirement of reports by any Federal entity involved in project planning or construction established by such Act shall be extended to any project affecting any stream or other body of water. Requires, in the making of reports under such Act, consultation with the National Marine Fisheries Service, and arrangements for such additional environmental impact assessments as the report of the Secretary of the Interior or the Secretary of Commerce may recommend or is otherwise found to be proper. Requires such Federal departments or agencies to give every appropriate opportunity for public participation in project planning. Requires reports made by the Secretary of the Interior and the Secretary of Commerce pursuant to the Act to be based in part on the findings, with respect to effects on wildlife resources attributable to the project, of the National Marine Fisheries Service. Makes it necessary for the appropriate Federal agency to be advised by the Secretary of the Interior and the Secretary of Commerce that they are satisfied with the measures recommended to prevent, mitigate, or compensate wildlife losses or damages resulting from the project. Provides that, in the case of a project constructed or financially assisted by the Federal Government, the appropriate Federal department or agency shall assume the costs of prevention, mitigation, and compensation for damages to wildlife resources. Provides that the appropriate Federal department or agency shall transfer to the National Marine Fisheries Service such funds as may be needed to conduct its duties under this Act. Strikes the provisions of the Fish and Wildlife Coordination Act preventing the application of such Act to Federal land use and management programs. Provides that any revenue from the use and operation of waters, lands, or interests therein may be available to the appropriate agency or department to carry out the purposes of this Act. Defines the terms used in this Act. Confers jurisdiction on the United States District Courts to entertain actions to enforce the provisions of this Act. Repeals the provisions of the Watershed Protection and Flood Prevention Act requiring a report concerning the preservation and development of wildlife resources upon approval of the Secretary of Agriculture of assistance to a local organization in preparing a plan for improvement works. (Amends 16 U.S.C. sec. 662, 663)
Written by analysts at the Congressional Research Service and published on Congress.gov, not by Civibrief. Summarized at the "Introduced in House" stage on May 1, 1974. It describes the bill, it is not the legal text.
Where is it in the process, and what happens next?
4 steps remain before this bill could become law.
The record's latest action, on May 1, 1974: Referred to House Committee on Merchant Marine and Fisheries.
- Clearing the committees it was referred to, and being scheduled for a floor vote
- Passage by the House
- Passage by the Senate
- The President's signature. If the President vetoes it, two-thirds of both chambers must vote to override.
How likely is it to become law?
Civibrief does not forecast outcomes and this page has no opinion about this one. What the record supports is a base rate, which is a fact about the whole pile, not a prediction about this measure.
In the 93rd Congress (1973-74), 651 of the 23,396 bills and joint resolutions introduced became law, about 2.8 percent. That count covers every measure at every stage, including the many that never left committee.
This one is not there yet: 4 steps are still outstanding, listed above.
Has anyone actually voted on it?
No. No roll call in this Congress cites this measure. That is the ordinary outcome: most measures never reach a recorded floor vote, and a committee ends most of them simply by not acting.
A vote is not the only thing that happens to a measure. Hearings, markups, and referrals are all recorded actions, and none of them is a vote of the full chamber.
Who is behind it?
JOHN BLATNIK (D-MN) introduced it on May 1, 1974. No cosponsors are recorded.
Cosponsoring is a formal signature on the text. It is not a commitment to vote for the measure, it does not bind anyone's party, and a long list of cosponsors is a measure of attention rather than of prospects.
How long has it been in play?
It was introduced on May 1, 1974, 19125 days ago. The most recent recorded action was 19125 days ago, on May 1, 1974.
Measures do not carry over. Anything the 93rd Congress has not finished by January 3, 1975 dies when the term ends, and has to be introduced again from the start in the next Congress.
Every answer above is assembled from this measure's own record on Congress.gov and from published counts of what Congress has passed before. Civibrief does not predict outcomes and takes no position on any measure.
Vote history
- HouseIn committee, no floor vote yet
- SenateAwaits House passage
- PresidentAwaits both chambers