Defense Facilities and Industrial Security Act
Latest action. Referred to House Committee on Internal Security.
Defense Facilities and Industrial Security Act - Authorizes the Federal Government to institute measures for the protection of defense production and of classified information released to industry against acts of subversion. Authorizes the Secretary of Defense to designate the following facilities as defense facilities: (1) facilities engaged in important classified military projects; (2) facilities producing important weapons, or defense systems, their subassemblies and components; (3) facilities producing basic material and raw material which are essential to the support of military production or mobilization programs and in limited supply; or (4) important utility and service facilities whose disruption or damage would seriously delay essential services in times of emergency or substantially affect the national defense capability. Provides that with respect to any educational institution only that part which is engaged in a classified military project shall be designated as a defense facility. Authorizes the President to issue such regulations and to prescribe such procedures as may be necessary for determining eligibility and authorization for access of individuals and for controlling such access to positions, places, or areas of employment in defense facilities which the Secretary of Defense determines to be sensitive. Prescribes specific standards and procedures for designation, by the Secretary of Defense under Presidential regulations, of selected facilities as "defense facilities." Requires the Secretary to give an opportunity both to management and labor to be heard with respect to the designation of any such facility. Requires the Secretary of Defense to designate the positions, places, and areas of employment in any defense facility which he determines to be sensitive. Establishes explicit hearing procedures for determining eligibility for access to, or control of, sensitive positions and classified information. Authorizes the President to suspend or revoke access to a sensitive position or to classified information prior to hearing, provided that the applicant is given prompt notice of the reasons for the action taken against him and thereafter, on request, a hearing is held in accordance with the applicable procedures. Requires a separation of the investigative or prosecution function from the decision function. Authorizes exclusion of the general public from the whole or any part of proceedings and hearings conducted under provisions of the bill, except that the hearings shall be public if the person requesting a hearing so demands. Requires the President to establish programs for the special training of personnel assigned or authorized for the execution of their duties under the title. Directs the President, in accordance with such regulations as he may prescribe, to provide for the reimbursement of all or any part of an applicant's net loss of earnings resulting directly from the suspension, denial, or revocation of access clearance pursuant to the provisions of this title. Authorizes the issuance of compulsory process for the attendance of witnesses and production of papers at any stage of any inquiry, investigation, or proceeding. Authorizes the Secretary of Defense to establish area restrictions and prohibitions limiting access to defense facilities, and facilities to which classified information is released, against intrusion by unauthorized persons. Provides that with respect to educational institutions, such area restrictions and prohibitions shall be limited to those areas directly involved in classified military projects. Authorizes the President to develop a voluntary program, in cooperation with business, labor, and other interested persons, to protect facilities of importance to defense mobilization against sabotage, espionage, acts of subversion, and other destructive acts and omissions. Denies jurisdiction to courts at any time to issue any injunction that would have the effect of granting or continuing access to sensitive positions in defense facilities or to classified information in cases where such access has been denied, suspended, or revoked pursuant to this Act. Provides that no court shall have jurisdiction of any other action or proceeding on the complaint of any person adversely affected except after prior exhaustion of the administrative remedies authorized by the Act.
Written by analysts at the Congressional Research Service and published on Congress.gov, not by Civibrief. Summarized at the "Introduced in House" stage on January 9, 1973. It describes the bill, it is not the legal text.
Where is it in the process, and what happens next?
4 steps remain before this bill could become law.
The record's latest action, on January 9, 1973: Referred to House Committee on Internal Security.
- Clearing the committees it was referred to, and being scheduled for a floor vote
- Passage by the House
- Passage by the Senate
- The President's signature. If the President vetoes it, two-thirds of both chambers must vote to override.
How likely is it to become law?
Civibrief does not forecast outcomes and this page has no opinion about this one. What the record supports is a base rate, which is a fact about the whole pile, not a prediction about this measure.
In the 93rd Congress (1973-74), 651 of the 23,396 bills and joint resolutions introduced became law, about 2.8 percent. That count covers every measure at every stage, including the many that never left committee.
This one is not there yet: 4 steps are still outstanding, listed above.
Has anyone actually voted on it?
No. No roll call in this Congress cites this measure. That is the ordinary outcome: most measures never reach a recorded floor vote, and a committee ends most of them simply by not acting.
A vote is not the only thing that happens to a measure. Hearings, markups, and referrals are all recorded actions, and none of them is a vote of the full chamber.
Who is behind it?
RICHARD ICHORD (D-MO) introduced it on January 9, 1973, and 4 members have since signed on as cosponsors.
They come from both major parties: 2 Democrats, 2 Republicans.
Cosponsoring is a formal signature on the text. It is not a commitment to vote for the measure, it does not bind anyone's party, and a long list of cosponsors is a measure of attention rather than of prospects.
How long has it been in play?
It was introduced on January 9, 1973, 19649 days ago. The most recent recorded action was 19649 days ago, on January 9, 1973.
Measures do not carry over. Anything the 93rd Congress has not finished by January 3, 1975 dies when the term ends, and has to be introduced again from the start in the next Congress.
Every answer above is assembled from this measure's own record on Congress.gov and from published counts of what Congress has passed before. Civibrief does not predict outcomes and takes no position on any measure.
Vote history
- HouseIn committee, no floor vote yet
- SenateAwaits House passage
- PresidentAwaits both chambers