Private, no accountPrivacy details: browsing privately, no account needed
You're browsing privately, no account needed. Your region stays in this session and your precise location is never stored.What we store
H.R. 354 · 96th CongressIn committee

A bill to amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1954 dealing with privacy.

Latest action. Referred to House Committee on Ways and Means. · January 15, 1979

Live record from Congress.gov, updated as the official record changes.
What this bill would do
Official summary · Congressional Research Service

Amends the Internal Revenue Code to repeal the authority of the Secretary of the Treasury to disclose to any party to a judicial or administrative tax proceeding whether a prospective juror has been the subject of a tax investigation or audit by the Internal Revenue Service. Restricts disclosure of tax return information to State and local tax officials by requiring that any disclosure directly relate to the administration or enforcement of State or local tax law. Permits the Secretary to refuse any disclosure which would identify a confidential informant or seriously impair any civil or criminal tax investigation. Prohibits disclosure of tax information to State or local tax officials unless their State or locality has adopted a law which restricts the disclosure of tax information to the same extent that this Act restricts disclosure. Requires written notification to a prospective Presidential appointee that a request has been made for disclosure of his tax returns. Requires that such appointee consent in writing to such disclosure. Limits the Secretary's authority to disclose the tax return information of individuals who owe child support payments to only that information which is required to locate such individuals. Repeals the authority of the Secretary to disclose nontax return information to another Federal agency for use in an administrative or judicial proceeding not relating to tax administration. Requires a Federal agency which seeks nontax return information to show in Federal district court that there is probable cause to believe that a specific Federal law has been violated, that such information is probative evidence of a fact in issue, that such disclosure is not otherwise prohibited by law, and that such information cannot reasonably be obtained from any other source.

Written by analysts at the Congressional Research Service and published on Congress.gov, not by Civibrief. Summarized at the "Introduced in House" stage on January 15, 1979. It describes the bill, it is not the legal text.

Status
Introduced
January 15, 1979
In committee
January 15, 1979
Passed a chamber
Cleared Congress
Enacted
Where this sits in the process
Common questions
Composed from the official record
Where is it in the process, and what happens next?

4 steps remain before this bill could become law.

The record's latest action, on January 15, 1979: Referred to House Committee on Ways and Means.

  1. Clearing the committees it was referred to, and being scheduled for a floor vote
  2. Passage by the House
  3. Passage by the Senate
  4. The President's signature. If the President vetoes it, two-thirds of both chambers must vote to override.
How likely is it to become law?

Civibrief does not forecast outcomes and this page has no opinion about this one. What the record supports is a base rate, which is a fact about the whole pile, not a prediction about this measure.

In the 96th Congress (1979-80), 613 of the 12,581 bills and joint resolutions introduced became law, about 4.9 percent. That count covers every measure at every stage, including the many that never left committee.

This one is not there yet: 4 steps are still outstanding, listed above.

Has anyone actually voted on it?

No. No roll call in this Congress cites this measure. That is the ordinary outcome: most measures never reach a recorded floor vote, and a committee ends most of them simply by not acting.

A vote is not the only thing that happens to a measure. Hearings, markups, and referrals are all recorded actions, and none of them is a vote of the full chamber.

Who is behind it?

BARRY GOLDWATER (R-CA) introduced it on January 15, 1979. No cosponsors are recorded.

Cosponsoring is a formal signature on the text. It is not a commitment to vote for the measure, it does not bind anyone's party, and a long list of cosponsors is a measure of attention rather than of prospects.

How long has it been in play?

It was introduced on January 15, 1979, 17452 days ago. The most recent recorded action was 17452 days ago, on January 15, 1979.

Measures do not carry over. Anything the 96th Congress has not finished by January 3, 1981 dies when the term ends, and has to be introduced again from the start in the next Congress.

Every answer above is assembled from this measure's own record on Congress.gov and from published counts of what Congress has passed before. Civibrief does not predict outcomes and takes no position on any measure.

Vote history

  1. House
    In committee, no floor vote yet
  2. Senate
    Awaits House passage
  3. President
    Awaits both chambers
No recorded votes yet
No roll call in this Congress cites this bill. Most bills die in committee without ever reaching a recorded floor vote.