Wetlands Reform Act of 1983
Latest action. Executive Comment Requested from EPA, Office of Management and BudgetThe President's budget and regulatory control center. It writes the President's budget request, apportions appropriated funds, and reviews significant agency rules.Read the full definition (opens a new tab).
Wetlands Reform Act of 1983 - Amends the Federal Water Pollution Control Act (also known as the Clean Water Act) to require that guidelines developed by the Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) for permits for the discharge of dredged or fill material into navigable waters shall prohibit specification of a disposal site unless specified demonstrations are made. Requires a demonstration that: (1) discharge of dredged or fill material at such site does not contain any toxic pollutant included on a specified list published under such Act (except a toxic pollutant which is only a trace contaminant in such discharge); (2) such discharge at such site will not have an unacceptable individual or cumulative adverse impact on the aquatic environment; and (3) there is no practicable alternative to the proposed discharge which would have less adverse effect on the environment. Revises provisions for denial or restriction of use of defined areas as disposal sites. Requires the Administrator to review permit applications and to deny or restrict such use upon determination of specified factors. Allows any person to petition the Administrator to deny or restrict dredged or fill activities in any defined area based on specified criteria. Directs the Administrator, within 30 days after receipt, to make a finding as to whether the petition presents substantial information indicating that the petitioned action may be warranted. Directs the Administrator to promptly notify the Secretary of the Army of each finding made and promptly make such finding public. Directs the Administrator, within 90 days after receiving a petition found to present substantial information that the petitioned action may be warranted, after notice and opportunity for a public hearing, to determine whether or not to implement the petitioned action or some modification of the petitioned action, based on determinations as to whether or not the discharge of such materials into such area will have an unacceptable adverse effect on municipal water supplies, shellfish beds and fishery areas (including spawning and breeding areas), wildlife, or recreation areas. Prohibits any individual or general permit for a dredged or fill material discharge activity from being issued before such a determination is made, if such activity would be precluded or restricted by implementation of the petitioned action that the Administrator has found may be warranted. Subjects such findings and determinations to judicial review. Provides for citizen lawsuits under such Act: (1) against the Secretary of the Army; and (2) with respect to any limitation or requirement of any guideline developed for permits for dredged or fill material.
Written by analysts at the Congressional Research Service and published on Congress.gov, not by Civibrief. Summarized at the "Introduced in House" stage on November 15, 1983. It describes the bill, it is not the legal text.
Executive Comment Requested from EPA, OMB.
Civibrief does not map this action to a stage in the process. See the official record.
Where is it in the process, and what happens next?
The latest action on file does not map to a stage Civibrief recognizes, so the page will not name one. The record's own words are the reliable fact here.
The record's latest action, on January 12, 1984: Executive Comment Requested from EPA, OMB.
How likely is it to become law?
Civibrief does not forecast outcomes and this page has no opinion about this one. What the record supports is a base rate, which is a fact about the whole pile, not a prediction about this measure.
In the 98th Congress (1983-84), 623 of the 10,560 bills and joint resolutions introduced became law, about 5.9 percent. That count covers every measure at every stage, including the many that never left committee.
This one has no outstanding steps listed above.
Has anyone actually voted on it?
No. No roll call in this Congress cites this measure. That is the ordinary outcome: most measures never reach a recorded floor vote, and a committee ends most of them simply by not acting.
A vote is not the only thing that happens to a measure. Hearings, markups, and referrals are all recorded actions, and none of them is a vote of the full chamber.
Who is behind it?
ROBERT MRAZEK (D-NY) introduced it on November 15, 1983, and 4 members have since signed on as cosponsors.
They are 4 Democrats.
Cosponsoring is a formal signature on the text. It is not a commitment to vote for the measure, it does not bind anyone's party, and a long list of cosponsors is a measure of attention rather than of prospects.
How long has it been in play?
It was introduced on November 15, 1983, 15688 days ago. The most recent recorded action was 15630 days ago, on January 12, 1984.
Measures do not carry over. Anything the 98th Congress has not finished by January 3, 1985 dies when the term ends, and has to be introduced again from the start in the next Congress.
Every answer above is assembled from this measure's own record on Congress.gov and from published counts of what Congress has passed before. Civibrief does not predict outcomes and takes no position on any measure.
Vote history
- HouseExecutive Comment Requested from EPA, OMB.
- SenateNot stated in the latest action
- PresidentNot stated in the latest action