Private, no accountPrivacy details: browsing privately, no account needed
You're browsing privately, no account needed. Your region stays in this session and your precise location is never stored.What we store
H.R. 5873 · 96th CongressIn committee

Judicial Conduct and Disability Act of 1979

Latest action. Referred to House Committee on the Judiciary. · November 13, 1979

Live record from Congress.gov, updated as the official record changes.
What this bill would do
Official summary · Congressional Research Service

Judicial Conduct and Disability Act of 1979 - Allows any person to file with the judicial council of the circuit in which the judge serves a written complaint against a judge of a court of appeals or a district court, alleging that such judge is: (1) unable to discharge efficiently all his or her duties because of mental or physical disability; or (2) engaging in conduct inconsistent with the effective administration of the court's business. Allows the judicial council to file such a complaint with respect to judges within its circuit after investigation on its own motion. Directs the judicial council to take action on each complaint in an expeditious manner. Requires that the judge affected be given an opportunity to appear before the judicial council. Allows the council to: (1) dismiss a complaint; (2) certify disability in accordance with current procedures; (3) request the judge to voluntarily retire with the provision that current length of service requirements not apply; (4) order that no further cases be assigned to such judge for a temporary period; (5) censure or reprimand the judge by means of a private communication or public announcement; or (6) order other appropriate action, except removal. Allows the complainant or judge to petition the Court of Judicial Conduct and Disability (established by this Act) for review of any such action. Directs the Judicial Conference of the United States to promulgate rules and procedures for the judicial councils in discharging such duties, or authorize the judicial council of each circuit to promulgate its own rules. Allows the Judicial Conference to modify any rule promulgated. Authorizes the Administrative Office of the United States Courts and the Federal Judicial Center to provide assistance to the judicial councils in discharging their duties. Establishes as a court of record the Court of Judicial Conduct and Disability, consisting of five Federal judges in regular active service, including at least one district court judge, to be appointed by the Chief Justice. Requires that the Court grant a petition for review upon a concurrence of two of its members. Authorizes the Court to dismiss a complaint or affirm, modify, or reverse and remand to the judicial council for further proceedings any action. Allows the Court to conduct a de novo hearing when required in the interests of justice. Gives to the judge affected certain due process rights at any such de novo hearing. Authorizes the Court by majority vote to: (1) dismiss an action; (2) certify disability; (3) order that no further cases be assigned to such judge for a temporary period; (4) censure or reprimand the judge by means of public announcement; or (5) order other appropriate action, except removal. Disallows judicial review of any order or action of the Court. Allows any person to file a complaint with: (1) the Judicial Council of the District of Columbia Circuit with respect to the chief judge of the Court of Claims, the Court of Customs and Patent Appeals, or the Customs Court; or (2) the chief judge of the applicable court with respect to any judge of such court. Applies the procedures of this Act to such complaints. Directs the Court of Judicial Conduct and Disability to submit to the House of Representatives a record of all proceedings revealing conduct which would in its view constitute an impeachable offense under the Constitution. Directs the Committee on the Judiciary of the House of Representatives to give timely consideration to such record and accompanying materials and to make its best efforts to take action within 90 days. Stipulates that no person shall be granted the right to intervene or appear as amicus curiae in any proceeding under this Act. Provides for the confidentiality of materials and deliberations under this Act, with specified exceptions. Requires that the Director of the Administrative Office of the United States Courts include in its annual report filed with Congress a summary of the complaints filed pursuant to this Act.

Written by analysts at the Congressional Research Service and published on Congress.gov, not by Civibrief. Summarized at the "Introduced in House" stage on November 13, 1979. It describes the bill, it is not the legal text.

Status
Introduced
November 13, 1979
In committee
November 13, 1979
Passed a chamber
Cleared Congress
Enacted
Where this sits in the process
Common questions
Composed from the official record
Where is it in the process, and what happens next?

4 steps remain before this bill could become law.

The record's latest action, on November 13, 1979: Referred to House Committee on the Judiciary.

  1. Clearing the committees it was referred to, and being scheduled for a floor vote
  2. Passage by the House
  3. Passage by the Senate
  4. The President's signature. If the President vetoes it, two-thirds of both chambers must vote to override.
How likely is it to become law?

Civibrief does not forecast outcomes and this page has no opinion about this one. What the record supports is a base rate, which is a fact about the whole pile, not a prediction about this measure.

In the 96th Congress (1979-80), 613 of the 12,581 bills and joint resolutions introduced became law, about 4.9 percent. That count covers every measure at every stage, including the many that never left committee.

This one is not there yet: 4 steps are still outstanding, listed above.

Has anyone actually voted on it?

No. No roll call in this Congress cites this measure. That is the ordinary outcome: most measures never reach a recorded floor vote, and a committee ends most of them simply by not acting.

A vote is not the only thing that happens to a measure. Hearings, markups, and referrals are all recorded actions, and none of them is a vote of the full chamber.

Who is behind it?

CHESTER LOTT (R-MS) introduced it on November 13, 1979. No cosponsors are recorded.

Cosponsoring is a formal signature on the text. It is not a commitment to vote for the measure, it does not bind anyone's party, and a long list of cosponsors is a measure of attention rather than of prospects.

How long has it been in play?

It was introduced on November 13, 1979, 17103 days ago. The most recent recorded action was 17103 days ago, on November 13, 1979.

Measures do not carry over. Anything the 96th Congress has not finished by January 3, 1981 dies when the term ends, and has to be introduced again from the start in the next Congress.

Every answer above is assembled from this measure's own record on Congress.gov and from published counts of what Congress has passed before. Civibrief does not predict outcomes and takes no position on any measure.

Vote history

  1. House
    In committee, no floor vote yet
  2. Senate
    Awaits House passage
  3. President
    Awaits both chambers
No recorded votes yet
No roll call in this Congress cites this bill. Most bills die in committee without ever reaching a recorded floor vote.