Private, no accountPrivacy details: browsing privately, no account needed
You're browsing privately, no account needed. Your region stays in this session and your precise location is never stored.What we store
S. 1459 · 117th CongressIn committee

PUBLIC Lands Act

Latest action. Committee on Energy and Natural Resources subcommitteeA smaller panel inside a standing committee with jurisdiction over a slice of its subject matter. Most hearings and the first markup usually happen here.Read the full definition (opens a new tab) on public landsLand owned by the federal government, about a quarter of the country, managed by agencies including the Bureau of Land Management, Forest Service, and Park Service.Read the full definition (opens a new tab), Forests, and Mining. Hearings held. With printed Hearing: S.Hrg. 117-453. · October 19, 2021

Live record from Congress.gov, updated as the official record changes.
What this bill would do
Official summary · Congressional Research Service

Protecting Unique and Beautiful Landscapes by Investing in California Lands Act or the PUBLIC Lands Act

This bill sets forth provisions concerning the restoration, economic development, and conservation of, and recreational access to, certain public lands in California.

The bill establishes

the South Fork Trinity-Mad River Restoration Area,

the California Public Lands Remediation Partnership,

the Trinity Lake and Del Norte County visitor centers,

the Horse Mountain Special Management Area,

the Elk Camp Ridge Recreation Trail,

the Sanhedrin Special Conservation Management Area, and

the Condor National Scenic Trail.

The bill designates

specified federal lands as components of the National Wilderness Preservation System,

the North Fork Wilderness as the North Fork Eel River Wilderness,

specified federal lands as potential wilderness areas,

specified segments of certain rivers and creeks and of a specified river estuary as components of the National Wild and Scenic Rivers System,

the Machesna Mountain and the Fox Mountain Potential Wilderness Areas,

the Condor Ridge and Black Mountain Scenic Areas, and

the San Gabriel National Recreation Area.

Also, the bill

authorizes the utilization of certain forest residues for research and development of biobased products that result in net carbon sequestration,

authorizes initiatives to restore degraded redwood forest ecosystems in the Redwood National Forest and state parks,

requires specified recreational studies and partnerships, and

expands the boundaries of the Elkhorn Ridge Wilderness and the San Gabriel Mountains National Monument.

Written by analysts at the Congressional Research Service and published on Congress.gov, not by Civibrief. Summarized at the "Introduced in Senate" stage on April 29, 2021. It describes the bill, it is not the legal text.

Status
Introduced
April 29, 2021
In committee
October 19, 2021
Passed a chamber
Cleared Congress
Enacted
Where this sits in the process
Common questions
Composed from the official record
Where is it in the process, and what happens next?

4 steps remain before this bill could become law.

The record's latest action, on October 19, 2021: Committee on Energy and Natural Resources Subcommittee on Public Lands, Forests, and Mining. Hearings held. With printed Hearing: S.Hrg. 117-453.

  1. Clearing the committees it was referred to, and being scheduled for a floor vote
  2. Passage by the Senate
  3. Passage by the House
  4. The President's signature. If the President vetoes it, two-thirds of both chambers must vote to override.
How likely is it to become law?

Civibrief does not forecast outcomes and this page has no opinion about this one. What the record supports is a base rate, which is a fact about the whole pile, not a prediction about this measure.

In the 117th Congress (2021-22), 362 of the 15,242 bills and joint resolutions introduced became law, about 2.4 percent. That count covers every measure at every stage, including the many that never left committee.

This one is not there yet: 4 steps are still outstanding, listed above.

Has anyone actually voted on it?

No. No roll call in this Congress cites this measure. That is the ordinary outcome: most measures never reach a recorded floor vote, and a committee ends most of them simply by not acting.

A vote is not the only thing that happens to a measure. Hearings, markups, and referrals are all recorded actions, and none of them is a vote of the full chamber.

Who is behind it?

Alex Padilla (D-CA) introduced it on April 29, 2021, and 1 member has since signed on as a cosponsor.

They are 1 Democrat.

Cosponsoring is a formal signature on the text. It is not a commitment to vote for the measure, it does not bind anyone's party, and a long list of cosponsors is a measure of attention rather than of prospects.

How long has it been in play?

It was introduced on April 29, 2021, 1960 days ago. The most recent recorded action was 1787 days ago, on October 19, 2021.

Measures do not carry over. Anything the 117th Congress has not finished by January 3, 2023 dies when the term ends, and has to be introduced again from the start in the next Congress.

Every answer above is assembled from this measure's own record on Congress.gov and from published counts of what Congress has passed before. Civibrief does not predict outcomes and takes no position on any measure.

Vote history

  1. Senate
    In committee, no floor vote yet
  2. House
    Awaits Senate passage
  3. President
    Awaits both chambers
No recorded votes yet
No roll call in this Congress cites this bill. Most bills die in committee without ever reaching a recorded floor vote.