Sentencing Reform Act of 1979
Latest action. Referred to Senate Committee on the Judiciary.
Sentencing Reform Act of 1979 - Amends the Federal criminal code to set forth a new sentencing structure applicable to a defendant who has been convicted of an offense under any Federal statute. Permits an individual to be sentenced to a term of imprisonment or probation, a fine, or restitution in cases involving bodily injury or death, property damage, or other loss. Permits an organization to receive such penalties, with the exception of imprisonment. Requires that the presentence investigation report made by a probation officer under rule 32(c) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure include information on noninstitutional sanctions. Specifies factors to be considered by a sentencing court, including: (1) the nature and circumstances of the offense; (2) the defendant's role in the offense, and aggravating or mitigating circumstances not reflected in the guidelines formulated by the Federal Sentencing Commission (established by this Act); (3) the types of sentences, including noninstitutional sanctions as a condition of probation; (4) the sentence recommended in the Commission's guidelines; (5) any pertinent policy statement issued by the Commission; and (6) the need to have uniform sentencing among defendants who have been found guilty of the same offense. Requires the court to state in open court at the time of sentencing the reasons for the imposition of the particular sentence and the specific reason for the imposition of a sentence different from that set forth in the guidelines. Requires the court to submit to the Commission a written report containing specified information within ten days of sentencing. Permits a defendant to appeal a final sentence in any case except where a sentence recommended in the guidelines is included in a plea agreement. Authorizes the court of appeals, upon a determination that the sentence is clearly unreasonable, to remand the case for imposition of a lesser sentence or impose a lesser sentence. Establishes procedures for imposition and revocation of a sentence of probation. Retains the current exceptions for a granting of probation (an offense punishable by life imprisonment or for which probation is expressly precluded by law). Includes among the authorized conditions of probation: (1) work in community service; (2) participation in a program of a residential community center; (3) necessary medical or psychiatric treatment; or (4) placement in the custody of the Bureau of Prisons for up to the lesser of six months or the authorized term of imprisonment during the first year of the term of probation. Requires, upon a determination that there is probable cause to believe that a condition of probation has been violated, that a revocation hearing be held within 30 days before a judge or a United States magistrate. Grants to the probationer with respect to such hearing the following rights: (1) reasonable notice; (2) opportunity to be represented by an attorney (or to have counsel provided); (3) opportunity to testify and present witnesses and evidence; and (4) opportunity to confront and cross-examine witnesses. Subjects a decision of a magistrate or judge to revoke probation to appellate review. Specifies factors to be considered by the court in determining the amount of restitution for loss that is the result of death or personal injury caused by the offense or for property loss. Directs the court to consider any factor relating to the offense or the defendant's finances in determining the amount of any fine, and the time for and method of payment. Establishes as an independent body in the judicial branch a seven-member Federal Sentencing Commission. Includes the Chairman of the Parole Commission and the Attorney General as ex officio members. Directs the President to appoint: (1) one member from a list of ten Federal judges provided by the Judicial Conference of the United States; (2) one member who is a Federal public defender; and (3) five members who represent a variety of backgrounds and who have demonstrated participation and interest in the criminal justice process. Directs the Commission, by affirmative vote of at least five members, to issue guidelines and general policy statements for use by a sentencing court. Enumerates the duties of the Commission with respect to such guidelines, including that: (1) they may provide for an increase or decrease of up to five percent of a term of imprisonment; and (2) they shall include a term of imprisonment when (A) serious bodily injury resulted from the defendant's participation in the offense, or (B) the offense is a felony and the defendant was previously convicted of a Federal, State, or local felony, unless a substantial time period has lapsed since such prior conviction; (3) the Commission revise such guidelines at least biannually and conduct hearings in performing its functions; and (4) the guidelines be reported to Congress by May 1st after the beginning of a regular session and become effective 90 days later, subject to disapproval or modification by Act of Congress. Specifies additional duties of the Commission, including among others: (1) monitoring the performance of probation officers; (2) establishing a research and development program to serve as an information center with respect to Federal sentencing practices and to serve in a consulting capacity to Federal courts and agencies; (3) studying the feasibility of guidelines for the disposition of juvenile delinquents; and (4) studying the plea bargaining process. Directs the Commission to: (1) report annually to the United States Judicial Conference, Congress, and the President on its activities; (2) submit at least annually to Congress an analysis of requisite reports and studies and appropriate legislative recommendations; (3) submit to Congress within three years of the issuance of guidelines a proposal for reducing all statutory maximum prison terms; and (4) submit to Congress with the Bureau of Prisons an analysis and recommendations concerning maximum utilization of prison resources. Requires that good time allowances be made within two days after the end of each month. Provides that such allowance vests at the time it is received. Substitutes the penalty of imprisonment for life without parole for specified Federal crimes which currently authorize the death penalty. Provides that the Commission shall become effective 60 days after enactment and shall issue guidelines within six months of enactment. Makes the remaining provisions effective 60 days after the effective date of the guidelines. Provides that the United States Parole Commission shall remain in effect until three years after the effective date of the guidelines.
Written by analysts at the Congressional Research Service and published on Congress.gov, not by Civibrief. Summarized at the "Introduced in Senate" stage on November 2, 1979. It describes the bill, it is not the legal text.
Where is it in the process, and what happens next?
4 steps remain before this bill could become law.
The record's latest action, on November 2, 1979: Referred to Senate Committee on the Judiciary.
- Clearing the committees it was referred to, and being scheduled for a floor vote
- Passage by the Senate
- Passage by the House
- The President's signature. If the President vetoes it, two-thirds of both chambers must vote to override.
How likely is it to become law?
Civibrief does not forecast outcomes and this page has no opinion about this one. What the record supports is a base rate, which is a fact about the whole pile, not a prediction about this measure.
In the 96th Congress (1979-80), 613 of the 12,581 bills and joint resolutions introduced became law, about 4.9 percent. That count covers every measure at every stage, including the many that never left committee.
This one is not there yet: 4 steps are still outstanding, listed above.
Has anyone actually voted on it?
No. No roll call in this Congress cites this measure. That is the ordinary outcome: most measures never reach a recorded floor vote, and a committee ends most of them simply by not acting.
A vote is not the only thing that happens to a measure. Hearings, markups, and referrals are all recorded actions, and none of them is a vote of the full chamber.
Who is behind it?
JOSEPH BIDEN (D-DE) introduced it on November 2, 1979, and 3 members have since signed on as cosponsors.
They come from both major parties: 1 Democrat, 2 Republicans.
Cosponsoring is a formal signature on the text. It is not a commitment to vote for the measure, it does not bind anyone's party, and a long list of cosponsors is a measure of attention rather than of prospects.
How long has it been in play?
It was introduced on November 2, 1979, 17114 days ago. The most recent recorded action was 17114 days ago, on November 2, 1979.
Measures do not carry over. Anything the 96th Congress has not finished by January 3, 1981 dies when the term ends, and has to be introduced again from the start in the next Congress.
Every answer above is assembled from this measure's own record on Congress.gov and from published counts of what Congress has passed before. Civibrief does not predict outcomes and takes no position on any measure.
Vote history
- SenateIn committee, no floor vote yet
- HouseAwaits Senate passage
- PresidentAwaits both chambers