Private, no accountPrivacy details: browsing privately, no account needed
You're browsing privately, no account needed. Your region stays in this session and your precise location is never stored.What we store
S. 295 · 96th CongressIn committee

Judicial Tenure Act

Latest action. Referred to Senate Committee on the Judiciary. · January 31, 1979

Live record from Congress.gov, updated as the official record changes.
What this bill would do
Official summary · Congressional Research Service

Judicial Tenure Act - Establishes a 12-member Judicial Conduct and Disability Commission, consisting of one member from each judicial circuit and one member selected collectively by the Court of Customs and Patent Appeals, Court of Claims, and the Customs Court, to receive complaints filed by any person with respect to the condition or conduct of a judge, or the conduct of a Justice, of the United States appointed to hold office during good behavior. Requires each circuit, the Court of Customs and Patent Appeals, Court of Claims, and the Customs Court to have a committee of judges to receive and review complaints against judges of their circuits or courts transmitted from the Commission. Directs the Commission to dismiss any complaint which it finds to be improperly verified or subscribed, frivolous, or lacking jurisdiction, and to investigate any complaints against a Supreme Court Justice which is not so dismissed. Directs the appropriate committee of judges, upon receipt of a complaint from the Commission, to determine the existence of any grounds specified: (1) in existing law for the involuntary retirement of a judge, or (2) in this Act for the removal or censure of a judge. Authorizes the committee to recommend to the Commission: (1) dismissal of the complaint; (2) further investigation by the Commission; or (3) that there be a reasonable period of time for the committee to address the matter raised in the complaint. Establishes the Court on Judicial Conduct and Disability, consisting of a presiding officer elected annually by the Judicial Conference of the United States and six members selected by such officer, as a court of record with all appropriate judicial powers incident or necessary to hear matters concerning the involuntary retirement, removal, or censure of a judge or Justice. Directs the Commission to recommend to the Court that a hearing be held upon a finding of sufficient cause to believe that the condition or conduct of the judges, or the conduct of the Justice, may be inconsistent with the good behavior standard. Authorizes the Court to decide the merits of a written complaint against a judge or Justice upon receipt of a report by the Commission. Gives the Commission the burden of proving such report before the Court by clear and convincing evidence. Specifies due process protections for the judge or Justice who is the subject of such hearing. Authorizes the Court to suspend without hearing a judge who has pleaded guilty, nolo contendere, or has been found guilty of a felony or any crime involving moral turpitude under Federal or State law. Conditions such suspension in all other cases on the holding of a hearing as provided by this Act. Directs the Court, in each case involving a judge brought before it, to order involuntary retirement, removal from office, censure, or dismissal of the case. Allows the judge affected to petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court within ten days after notification of such order. Directs the Court, in each case involving a Justice brought before it, to recommend to the House of Representatives the impeachment or censure of the Justice, or to order dismissal of the case. Provides that removal or censure may be ordered by the Court upon a finding that the conduct of the judge has been inconsistent with the good behavior standard required by article III, section 1 of the Constitution. Specifies that such conduct includes, but is not limited to: (1) willful misconduct in office; (2) willful and persistent failure to perform duties of the office; (3) habitual intemperance; and (4) other conduct prejudicial to the administration of justice and which brings the judicial office into disrepute.

Written by analysts at the Congressional Research Service and published on Congress.gov, not by Civibrief. Summarized at the "Introduced in Senate" stage on January 31, 1979. It describes the bill, it is not the legal text.

Status
Introduced
January 31, 1979
In committee
January 31, 1979
Passed a chamber
Cleared Congress
Enacted
Where this sits in the process
Common questions
Composed from the official record
Where is it in the process, and what happens next?

4 steps remain before this bill could become law.

The record's latest action, on January 31, 1979: Referred to Senate Committee on the Judiciary.

  1. Clearing the committees it was referred to, and being scheduled for a floor vote
  2. Passage by the Senate
  3. Passage by the House
  4. The President's signature. If the President vetoes it, two-thirds of both chambers must vote to override.
How likely is it to become law?

Civibrief does not forecast outcomes and this page has no opinion about this one. What the record supports is a base rate, which is a fact about the whole pile, not a prediction about this measure.

In the 96th Congress (1979-80), 613 of the 12,581 bills and joint resolutions introduced became law, about 4.9 percent. That count covers every measure at every stage, including the many that never left committee.

This one is not there yet: 4 steps are still outstanding, listed above.

Has anyone actually voted on it?

No. No roll call in this Congress cites this measure. That is the ordinary outcome: most measures never reach a recorded floor vote, and a committee ends most of them simply by not acting.

A vote is not the only thing that happens to a measure. Hearings, markups, and referrals are all recorded actions, and none of them is a vote of the full chamber.

Who is behind it?

SAMUEL NUNN (D-GA) introduced it on January 31, 1979, and 1 member has since signed on as a cosponsor.

They are 1 Democrat.

Cosponsoring is a formal signature on the text. It is not a commitment to vote for the measure, it does not bind anyone's party, and a long list of cosponsors is a measure of attention rather than of prospects.

How long has it been in play?

It was introduced on January 31, 1979, 17389 days ago. The most recent recorded action was 17389 days ago, on January 31, 1979.

Measures do not carry over. Anything the 96th Congress has not finished by January 3, 1981 dies when the term ends, and has to be introduced again from the start in the next Congress.

Every answer above is assembled from this measure's own record on Congress.gov and from published counts of what Congress has passed before. Civibrief does not predict outcomes and takes no position on any measure.

Vote history

  1. Senate
    In committee, no floor vote yet
  2. House
    Awaits Senate passage
  3. President
    Awaits both chambers
No recorded votes yet
No roll call in this Congress cites this bill. Most bills die in committee without ever reaching a recorded floor vote.