Private, no accountPrivacy details: browsing privately, no account needed
You're browsing privately, no account needed. Your region stays in this session and your precise location is never stored.What we store
S. 47 · 116th CongressEnacted

John D. Dingell, Jr. Conservation, Management, and Recreation Act

Latest action. Became public lawWhat a bill becomes when enacted, numbered by Congress and order of enactment: Public Law 119-4 is the 4th law of the 119th Congress.Read the full definition (opens a new tab) No: 116-9. · March 12, 2019

Live record from Congress.gov, updated as the official record changes.
What this bill would do
Official summary · Congressional Research Service

John D. Dingell, Jr. Conservation, Management, and Recreation Act

This bill sets forth provisions regarding various programs, projects, activities, and studies for the management and conservation of natural resources on federal lands.

TITLE I--PUBLIC LAND AND FORESTS

Subtitle A--Land Exchanges and Conveyances

(Sec. 1001) This section directs the Department of Agriculture (USDA) to conduct a land exchange upon request by the Broadmoor Hotel, Inc. (BHI) in Colorado. Specifically, USDA must (1) convey to the BHI 83 acres of specified federal land within the Pike National Forest in Teller County, Colorado, together with a nonexclusive perpetual access easement for the BHI to and from such land on Forest Service Road 371; and (2) accept in exchange 320 acres of specified nonfederal land in such forest and a permanent trail easement for the Barr Trail in El Paso County, Colorado.

(Sec. 1002) The bill adjusts the boundary of the Arapaho National Forest in Colorado to incorporate four lots totaling approximately 92.95 acres of land. A lot may be included in the boundary's adjustment only after the USDA has obtained written consent for its inclusion from the owner of the lot. USDA shall include certain federal land within the Bowen Gulch Protection Area.

(Sec. 1003) This section directs the Department of the Interior to conduct a land exchange upon request by the San Bernardino Valley Water Conservation District in California. Specifically, Interior must (1) convey to the district in 327 acres of identified federal land administered by the Bureau of Land Management (BLM) and any portion of an identified federal parcel necessary to equalize the values of the lands exchanged, and (2) accept in exchange 310 acres of district land and any portion of an identified nonfederal parcel necessary to equalize the values of the lands exchanged.

(Sec.1004) This section directs Interior to convey, without consideration, to the city of Tucson, Arizona, the reversionary interests of the United States in and to a 172.8-acre parcel of land owned by the city for the purpose of unencumbering the title to such land to enable its economic development.

The summary continues for 291 more paragraphs. Read it in full on Congress.gov

Written by analysts at the Congressional Research Service and published on Congress.gov, not by Civibrief. Summarized at the "Public Law" stage on March 12, 2019. It describes the bill, it is not the legal text.

Status
Introduced
January 8, 2019
In committee
Passed a chamber
Cleared Congress
Enacted
March 12, 2019
Where this sits in the process
Common questions
Composed from the official record
Where is it in the process, and what happens next?

This bill has been enacted. It is law.

The record's latest action, on March 12, 2019: Became Public Law No: 116-9.

Has anyone actually voted on it?

No. No roll call in this Congress cites this measure. That is the ordinary outcome: most measures never reach a recorded floor vote, and a committee ends most of them simply by not acting.

A vote is not the only thing that happens to a measure. Hearings, markups, and referrals are all recorded actions, and none of them is a vote of the full chamber.

Who is behind it?

Lisa Murkowski (R-AK) introduced it on January 8, 2019, and 15 members have since signed on as cosponsors.

They come from both major parties: 7 Democrats, 7 Republicans, 1 independent.

Cosponsoring is a formal signature on the text. It is not a commitment to vote for the measure, it does not bind anyone's party, and a long list of cosponsors is a measure of attention rather than of prospects.

Every answer above is assembled from this measure's own record on Congress.gov and from published counts of what Congress has passed before. Civibrief does not predict outcomes and takes no position on any measure.

Vote history

  1. Senate
    Passed
  2. House
    Passed
  3. President
    Signed into law
No recorded votes yet
No roll call in this Congress cites this bill. Most bills die in committee without ever reaching a recorded floor vote.