Private, no accountPrivacy details: browsing privately, no account needed
You're browsing privately, no account needed. Your region stays in this session and your precise location is never stored.What we store
H.J.Res. 13 · 98th CongressIn committee

A joint resolution calling for a mutual and verifiable freeze on and reductions in nuclear weapons.

Latest action. Placed on Senate legislative calendarThe list of measures reported out of committee and eligible for floor action. Being on the calendar is not a promise of a vote.Read the full definition (opens a new tab) under Regular Orders. Calendar No. 129. · May 9, 1983

Live record from Congress.gov, updated as the official record changes.
What this bill would do
Official summary · Congressional Research Service

(Measure passed House, amended, roll call #89 (278-149)) States that, consistent with maintaining equal overall nuclear capabilities, the strategic arms reduction talks (START) between the United States and the Soviet Union should: (1) pursue an immediate, mutual, and verifiable freeze; (2) decide when and how to achieve a mutual and verifiable freeze on the testing, production, and deployment of nuclear warheads, missiles, and other delivery systems (excluding submarines); (3) give special attention to destabilizing weapons; (4) provide for cooperative measures of verification; (5) pursue reductions through numerical ceilings and other means; (6) preserve present limitations on nuclear weapons; and (7) incorporate present negotiations in Geneva on intermediate range nuclear systems into the START negotiations (discussing the impact of developing comprehensive defense systems consistent with a specific treaty). Requires that every effort be made to reach common positions with the NATO allies. States that this resolution, in the absence of a bilateral agreement, is not intended to prevent the exercise of U.S. responsibility under a specific 1979 NATO decision. States that this resolution shall not be construed to: (1) prevent taking advantage of concurrent and complimentary arms control proposals; (2) supercede the President's treatymaking powers; and (3) prevent measures necessary for the maintenance of the U.S. nuclear deterrent. Declares that this resolution does not endorse any type of unilateral disarmanent by the United States. Provides that until the United States and the Soviet Union have ratified the nuclear arms control objectives, nothing in this resolution shall be construed to prevent modernization and deployment of U.S. weapons to maintain the U.S. nuclear deterrent. Proposes that specified House and Senate committees study measures relating to arms reductions and concurrent and complementary arms control proposals, especially those aimed at a mutual "build-down" or other verifiable processes. States that any freeze agreement: (1) should not prohibit the United States from taking measures with respect to strategic systems to protect U.S. lives; and (2) will not prohibit the one-for-one replacement of nuclear weapons and nuclear delivery vehicles, provided such weapon or vehicle is of the same type. States that this resolution shall not be construed to prevent, during negotiations, the modernization and deployment of new or improved U.S. dual capable delivery systems required to maintain the capability of the U.S. defense posture. Prohibits any action that will disarm, reduce, or limit U.S. armed forces or armaments, except pursuant to presidential treatymaking power or by legislation. Provides for the maintenance of a research, development, and safety-related improvements program to assure U.S. nuclear deterrent superiority. Declares that any agreement reached shall provide for full compliance by all parties with preexisting international treaties, obligations, and commitments. Directs the President to take steps to ensure verification of any agreement, including measures to complement National Technical Means of Verification and to ensure compliance. States that nothing in this resolution shall be construed to prevent safety- related improvements in strategic bombers.

Written by analysts at the Congressional Research Service and published on Congress.gov, not by Civibrief. Summarized at the "Passed House amended" stage on May 4, 1983. It describes the bill, it is not the legal text.

Status
Introduced
January 3, 1983
In committee
May 9, 1983
Passed a chamber
Cleared Congress
Enacted
Where this sits in the process
Common questions
Composed from the official record
Where is it in the process, and what happens next?

4 steps remain before this joint resolution could become law.

The record's latest action, on May 9, 1983: Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under Regular Orders. Calendar No. 129.

  1. Clearing the committees it was referred to, and being scheduled for a floor vote
  2. Passage by the House
  3. Passage by the Senate
  4. The President's signature. If the President vetoes it, two-thirds of both chambers must vote to override.
What is a joint resolution, exactly?

A joint resolution travels the same road as a bill: both chambers pass it and the President signs it, and it then has the same force as any other law. The label is largely a matter of custom, often used for narrow or time-limited measures.

One exception matters. A joint resolution proposing an amendment to the Constitution is not sent to the President at all. It goes to the states, and three quarters of them have to ratify it.

How likely is it to become law?

Civibrief does not forecast outcomes and this page has no opinion about this one. What the record supports is a base rate, which is a fact about the whole pile, not a prediction about this measure.

In the 98th Congress (1983-84), 623 of the 10,560 bills and joint resolutions introduced became law, about 5.9 percent. That count covers every measure at every stage, including the many that never left committee.

This one is not there yet: 4 steps are still outstanding, listed above.

Has anyone actually voted on it?

No. No roll call in this Congress cites this measure. That is the ordinary outcome: most measures never reach a recorded floor vote, and a committee ends most of them simply by not acting.

A vote is not the only thing that happens to a measure. Hearings, markups, and referrals are all recorded actions, and none of them is a vote of the full chamber.

Who is behind it?

CLEMENT ZABLOCKI (D-WI) introduced it on January 3, 1983, and 200 members have since signed on as cosponsors.

They come from both major parties: 183 Democrats, 17 Republicans.

Cosponsoring is a formal signature on the text. It is not a commitment to vote for the measure, it does not bind anyone's party, and a long list of cosponsors is a measure of attention rather than of prospects.

How long has it been in play?

It was introduced on January 3, 1983, 15956 days ago. The most recent recorded action was 15830 days ago, on May 9, 1983.

Measures do not carry over. Anything the 98th Congress has not finished by January 3, 1985 dies when the term ends, and has to be introduced again from the start in the next Congress.

Every answer above is assembled from this measure's own record on Congress.gov and from published counts of what Congress has passed before. Civibrief does not predict outcomes and takes no position on any measure.

Vote history

  1. House
    In committee, no floor vote yet
  2. Senate
    Awaits House passage
  3. President
    Awaits both chambers
No recorded votes yet
No roll call in this Congress cites this bill. Most bills die in committee without ever reaching a recorded floor vote.